morphological

CEFRC1

/ˌmɔːfəˈlɒd͡ʒɪkl̩/

adjective

Türkçe translations

Translating…

In plain English

Examples

At a glance

Sits at C1 on the CEFR scale

Deep Dive

In context

Before I simply create a root meaning X, is there any way I can use Ithkuil morphological categories or the 150 or so suffix categories to derive this word from a more general or primary word?
There is some morphological syntax to adverbs in English: Many can be formed from adjectives, plus the suffix -ly.

Two questions on this entry. Nothing is scored.

Question 1 · Quick check

Practise this properly in the app, where the word comes back before you forget it.

The word in print, with each source given in full.

Before I simply create a root meaning X, is there any way I can use Ithkuil morphological categories or the 150 or so suffix categories to derive this word from a more general or primary word?
2006, “Ithkuil Q & A”, in The Conlanger's Library, archived from the original on 14 Jan 2025, page 3
In much the same way, morphological competence is reflected in the native speaker's intuitions about morphological well-formedness and structure. For example, native speakers of English know that van and can have the respective plural forms vans and cans, but that the plural of man is men and not *mans. [...]
1988, Andrew Radford, Transformational Grammar, Cambridge: University Press, →ISBN, page 5
There is some morphological syntax to adverbs in English: Many can be formed from adjectives, plus the suffix -ly.
2025, Edward A. F. Gibson, “Dependency Grammar” (chapter 3), in Syntax: A Cognitive Approach, MIT Press, →DOI, →ISBN, page 67

Looking a word up is the easy part. LexUp remembers which words you have met and brings them back at the point you were about to forget them.

From morphology + -ical.